Wrong, wrong, wrong

MARIE: The more Jon needs my help, the more he resents it. I can understand that in my head, I can see how bloody painful it must be to realize that there’s one thing after another that you used to do as a matter of course, from zipping your coat to answering your letters, that you now have to leave to others. Or rather, to one other.  You can’t really direct your anger at a disease, and since Jon never believed in fate or any deity, that won’t work as a lightning rod either. So what’s left but to let me have it?

Not in an openly aggressive way (at least not since he frightened us both by shaking his fist in my face some months ago), but by saying and showing that everything I do, everything I suggest, is just wrong, wrong, wrong. I’m careless, controlling, moody, patronizing, childish, self-indulgent. If I try to tell him how I feel about things, he simply walks away. It seems to me that he has no use for me at all, just enormous, indignant need.

 

I asked him about his anger. Was he angry about not being allowed to drive? Yes. About being unable to work? Yes. Unable to read a book? Yes. Having constant back pain? Yes. Having to lug around his duodopa pump? Yes. Whatever I asked about, he was angry about it. Then I asked who he was angry at. Was he angry at the paid helpers? No, not really. Angry at his children or his sister? Certainly not. Angry at my family? Not a bit of it. Angry at me? YES, emphatically so. Why? For doing everything wrong.

 

This is not Jon. The man I met, loved, married, may have been stubborn and dismissive at times, but never angry or aggressive. What is going on?

 

It’s not about Parkinson’s anymore. This blog has changed over the last year or so. I’ve tried to keep a focus on Parkinson’s, like we originally intended, but PD just isn’t our main problem now. Which is of course partly because Jon is now fairly well medicated with the duodopa pump, so he’s physically better. Only as soon as one issue is dealt with, the next one rears its hideous head.

 

Now the greatest challenge by far is Jon’s cognitive decline. Ever since his diagnosis with Parkinson’s dementia a few years ago, he has chosen to ignore the signs and carry on regardless. I was taken aback at first, but came to see what a helpful strategy that was for him. Only now he’s come up against the wall and can no longer kid himself that all is well. I think that’s why the anger is erupting now, when his decline forces him to acknowledge his condition.

 

Nobody should have to know about themselves that they are slowly losing their faculties; that is the cruelest thing of all. But understand it as I may try to do, I still get terribly hurt and feel horrendously frustrated. I can’t even act natural around Jon anymore. Everything I say to him has been weighed and considered: will he understand? Will he misunderstand? Is the timing right? Is the wording right? Could I, should I go about it some other way?

 

I’ve talked to those who ought to know, and they tell me I’m not doing anything wrong, that dementia just takes some people that way. The anger may continue or it may go away, but there’s not a lot anyone can do about it. Well, we got Jon on anti-depressants a few months ago, and I wonder if upping the dose might help a bit, but I daren’t hold out much hope.

 

Yesterday, I suggested that he needed a bit of pruning, as in a haircut, a beard trim and eyebrow services. He said he’d only have the beard trim, and only if I did exactly as he instructed. I hesitated, trying to figure out a non-confrontational way to persuade him of the haircut. He got fed up and decided to do the job himself. So now he has a big bald spot on one cheek and a mouth still hidden under the overhanging thatch.  Hair like a man going feral, of course, not to mention the unibrow and the guitarist’s nails.

 

Why do I care so much? Why can’t I just leave it be, do as he wants, trim his beard for him and let him grow his hair long? Sure, it would look somewhat eccentric, but so what? Does his appearance reflect on me? (Yes, I’m ashamed to say that I think it does a bit, though it shouldn’t.) Is it worth the upset? Of course it isn’t.

 

So why am I nevertheless upset? I think it’s the sheer volume of passive aggression. This morning we even had a fight about tooth brushing. It’s getting ridiculous. I’m feeling stretched, undermined, rejected, unappreciated, frustrated. Sometimes I even feel a little bit abused. Sorry if I’m not taking that as well as I might. I reckon I need a break.

Doing my scales

It’s been a while since I last posted, and in fact I am beginning to wonder if this blog is a good idea. It makes me somehow very self-centered and probably bores the pants off my readers (assuming that I have any – I’ve not dared to add a hit counter yet). These navel-gazing questions of how I (we) have been, are there any new symptoms, have I adjusted my medication / seen a doctor / had an insight – do I even want to think about it? There is such a thing as healthy denial, you know.

One day at a time, as they say, and on a day-to-day basis there are no changes, or the changes are too small to detect, i.e. falling below the threshold of the ‘just noticeable difference’. I wonder what the SI unit for that is? Marie suggests the St Peter after the statue of same in the Church of St Peter in Rome. Apparently, the devout all kiss or stroke one foot of this statue, and while of course you see no difference from day to day, if you take a perspective of years or decades the foot is clearly eroded by belief – to the point where Peter is now, as far as she knows, on his third extremity. For Parkinson’s, the St Peter could be based on twitches per day, or time to put socks on, or perhaps likelihood of getting to the phone before the answering machine kicks in.

This new unit seems to me an improvement over the current tool used by neurologists, the Hoen and Yahr scale which is just a five point scale for impairments physical, mental, occupational, social, etc. Here, a score of one equals very mild symptoms (a slight tremor, a little slowness) while a score of five denotes conditions you really don’t want to think about too much, involving wheelchairs, enemas and cognitive meltdown.

Talking of which: we played chess, I won a couple of games but I also managed to lose some by such ploys as taking my own pawns when I forgot whether I was black or white. Was this a symptom of ageing, fatigue, alcohol or the beginnings of something nastier? Who knows. Likewise, I got persuaded to contribute to the radio programme about my dad that I mentioned in an earlier blog. I gave a short interview about my work over the phone and to be honest I think I made a total balls of it, sprouting nonsense and non-sequiteurs all over the place. The interviewer claims he can edit it into something reasonable, and I say good luck to him.

As far as I am aware, there are no accurate tests, no machine to tell you that you are exactly 3.23 on the Parkinson’s scale and deteriorating by 0.14 per year. And if there were, would I want to use such a machine, or is (some) ignorance really bliss? It’s a slow and insidious process, and given that there is no cure and that treatment only gets less effective over time, what is the value of knowing?

Perhaps I would rather live as our cat who was born with a degenerative, incurable kidney disease and by now has hardly any normal kidney tissue or life expectancy left. But the cat doesn’t know that, and the disease has progressed slowly enough for him to adjust to the effects at every stage and continue to live an almost entirely normal cat life of playing, snoozing, looking cute and ruthlessly killing small furry animals. This seems to me a pretty ideal way of being terminally ill.

So I’m opting for a denial strategy. I’m fine if anyone asks, and if they really, really probe I think I’ll continue to claim that I’m fine, although I may add an ‘–ish’ to indicate this is rather less than the full story. For a while, then, I will leave this blog to Marie who claims to be bursting with things to write about. My ears are burning already...